Critic Reviews

81

Metascore

Based on 38 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
100
The Hollywood Reporter
The best one yet.
90
Variety
Last year's "The Prisoner of Azkaban" seemed dark, but this excellent fourth film derived from J.K. Rowling's books is the darkest "Potter" yet, intense enough to warrant a PG-13 rating.
80
Newsweek
The uncontestable triumph of Goblet of Fire, however, is Brendan Gleeson's Alastor (Mad-Eye) Moody, the grizzled new Defense Against the Dark Arts professor.
80
The A.V. Club
Whenever it hits its stride, it's a well-acted, vividly executed, full-speed-ahead special-effects extravaganza that puts as much bang as possible into every remaining scene.
75
Rolling Stone
With the cast getting looser and the mind games kinkier, it's hard to resist.
75
New York Post
Fine for people of developing minds, but the story so often stops its forward motion to take us on long detours into the land of CGI effects that it amounts to a $150 million magic show.
75
ReelViews
Imperfect, but magical nonetheless.
67
Entertainment Weekly
Kids may be appropriately terrified, but to this overgrown Potter fan, Voldemort, the Darth Vader of the black arts, was a heck of a lot scarier when you couldn't see him.
60
Empire
Terrific effects and considerable charm, but, once again, you can't help wishing the filmmakers had been bolder with the adaptation.
60
Village Voice
To this viewer and reader, the decade-old juggernaut is as deeply felt as it is flawed, dense and illogical and laudably "weird."

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews